<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
    <title>Insufficient.Coffee - statistics</title>
    <subtitle>On a mission to solve communications security issues for the whole Internet. That, and drink coffee.</subtitle>
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://insufficient.coffee/tag/statistics/atom.xml"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://insufficient.coffee"/>
    <generator uri="https://www.getzola.org/">Zola</generator>
    <updated>2017-07-10T00:00:00+00:00</updated>
    <id>https://insufficient.coffee/tag/statistics/atom.xml</id>
    <entry xml:lang="en">
        <title>Cutting over Let&#x27;s Encrypt&#x27;s Statistics to Map&#x2F;Reduce</title>
        <published>2017-07-10T00:00:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2017-07-10T00:00:00+00:00</updated>
        
        <author>
          <name>
            
              Unknown
            
          </name>
        </author>
        
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://insufficient.coffee/cutting-over-lets-encrypts-statistics-to-map-reduce/"/>
        <id>https://insufficient.coffee/cutting-over-lets-encrypts-statistics-to-map-reduce/</id>
        
        <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;We&#x27;re &lt;a rel=&quot;external&quot; href=&quot;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tacticalsecret.com&#x2F;analyzing-letsencrypt-stats-via-map-reduce&#x2F;&quot;&gt;changing the methodology&lt;&#x2F;a&gt; used to calculate the &lt;a rel=&quot;external&quot; href=&quot;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;letsencrypt.org&#x2F;stats&#x2F;&quot;&gt;Let&#x27;s Encrypt Statistics page&lt;&#x2F;a&gt;, primarily to better cope with the growth of Let&#x27;s Encrypt. Over the past several months it&#x27;s become clear that the existing methodology is less accurate than we had expected, over-counting the number of websites using Let&#x27;s Encrypt, and the number of active certificates. The new methodology is more easily spot-checked, and thus, we believe, is more accurate.</summary>
        
    </entry>
    <entry xml:lang="en">
        <title>Analyzing Let&#x27;s Encrypt statistics via Map&#x2F;Reduce</title>
        <published>2017-05-16T00:00:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2017-05-16T00:00:00+00:00</updated>
        
        <author>
          <name>
            
              Unknown
            
          </name>
        </author>
        
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://insufficient.coffee/analyzing-letsencrypt-stats-via-map-reduce/"/>
        <id>https://insufficient.coffee/analyzing-letsencrypt-stats-via-map-reduce/</id>
        
        <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;I&#x27;ve been supplying the statistics for Let&#x27;s Encrypt since they&#x27;ve launched. In Q4 of 2016 their volume of certificates exceeded the ability of my database server to cope, and I moved it to an Amazon RDS instance.&amp;hellip;
&lt;&#x2F;p&gt;
</summary>
        
    </entry>
    <entry xml:lang="en">
        <title>Let&#x27;s Encrypt&#x27;s Growth to 10 Million Active Unique FQDNs</title>
        <published>2016-09-30T00:00:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2016-09-30T00:00:00+00:00</updated>
        
        <author>
          <name>
            
              Unknown
            
          </name>
        </author>
        
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://insufficient.coffee/lets-encrypts-growth-to-10m-fqdns/"/>
        <id>https://insufficient.coffee/lets-encrypts-growth-to-10m-fqdns/</id>
        
        <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yesterday Let&#x27;s Encrypt reached a new milestone: the unique set of all fully-qualified domain names in the currently-unexpired certificates issued by Let&#x27;s Encrypt is now &lt;strong&gt;10,022,446&lt;&#x2F;strong&gt;.&amp;hellip;
&lt;&#x2F;p&gt;
</summary>
        
    </entry>
</feed>